President Obama Fires General McChrystal

June 23, 2010

As expected, President Obama accepted the resignation of General Stanley McChrystal who has been commander over all of the U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan. He is being replaced by General David H, Petraeus.

McChrystal and some of his team members attacked the president and members of the administration in a Rolling Stone article, The Runaway General, that was released online yesterday.  Some of his fouled-mouth advisors were quoted as dissing Vice-President Biden and making other insubordinate remarks.

From Fox News:
The article says that although McChrystal voted for Obama, the two failed to connect from the start. Obama called McChrystal on the carpet last fall for speaking too bluntly about his desire for more troops.

"I found that time painful," McChrystal said in the article, on newsstands Friday. "I was selling an unsellable position."

It quoted an adviser to McChrystal dismissing the early meeting with Obama as a "10-minute photo-op."

"Obama clearly didn't know anything about him, who he was. The boss was pretty disappointed," the adviser told the magazine.

Some of the strongest criticism was reserved for Richard Holbrooke, Obama's special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan.

"The boss says he's like a wounded animal," one of the general's aides was quoted as saying. "Holbrooke keeps hearing rumors that he's going to get fired, so that makes him dangerous."

McChrystal said he felt "betrayed" by Eikenberry for expressing doubts about his proposed troop buildup last year and accused the ambassador of giving himself cover.

...The article claims McChrystal has seized control of the war "by never taking his eye off the real enemy: The wimps in the White House."
McChrystal apologized to the president saying: "I extend my sincerest apology for this profile. It was a mistake reflecting poor judgment and should never have happened."

Elected leaders from across party lines agreed that the president had to let McChrystal go. The Lexington Herald-Leader reported::
Graham, R-S.C., appeared with Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., all three members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, at a crowded news conference at the Capitol. 
"I've been a military officer most of my adult life, and there's lines you can't cross," Graham said. "Those lines were crossed. It was poor judgment, but it was beyond poor judgment. It made it virtually impossible for the general to stay in his job." 
The three senators, who've taken numerous trips together to Afghanistan, lauded Obama's decision to replace McChrystal with Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan.
Rolling Stone compared McCrystal and Petraeus:
Where Gen. Petraeus is kind of a dweeb, a teacher's pet with a Ranger's tab, McChrystal is a snake-eating rebel, a "Jedi" commander, as Newsweek called him.

The following are President Obama's remarks concerning McChrystal's resignation:
June 23, 2010
Rose Garden
1:43 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon. Today I accepted General Stanley McChrystal’s resignation as commander of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. I did so with considerable regret, but also with certainty that it is the right thing for our mission in Afghanistan, for our military, and for our country.

I’m also pleased to nominate General David Petraeus to take command in Afghanistan, which will allow us to maintain the momentum and leadership that we need to succeed.

Over the last nine years, with America fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, he has earned a reputation as one of our nation’s finest soldiers. That reputation is founded upon his extraordinary dedication, his deep intelligence, and his love of country. I relied on his service, particularly in helping to design and lead our new strategy in Afghanistan. So all Americans should be grateful for General McChrystal’s remarkable career in uniform.

But war is bigger than any one man or woman, whether a private, a general, or a president. And as difficult as it is to lose General McChrystal, I believe that it is the right decision for our national security.

The conduct represented in the recently published article does not meet the standard that should be set by a commanding general. It undermines the civilian control of the military that is at the core of our democratic system. And it erodes the trust that’s necessary for our team to work together to achieve our objectives in Afghanistan.

My multiple responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief led me to this decision. First, I have a responsibility to the extraordinary men and women who are fighting this war, and to the democratic institutions that I’ve been elected to lead. I’ve got no greater honor than serving as Commander-in-Chief of our men and women in uniform, and it is my duty to ensure that no diversion complicates the vital mission that they are carrying out.

That includes adherence to a strict code of conduct. The strength and greatness of our military is rooted in the fact that this code applies equally to newly enlisted privates and to the general officer who commands them. That allows us to come together as one. That is part of the reason why America has the finest fighting force in the history of the world.

It is also true that our democracy depends upon institutions that are stronger than individuals. That includes strict adherence to the military chain of command, and respect for civilian control over that chain of command. And that’s why, as Commander-in-Chief, I believe this decision is necessary to hold ourselves accountable to standards that are at the core of our democracy.

al Qaeda. I believe that this mission demands unity of effort across our alliance and across my national security team. And I don’t think that we can sustain that unity of effort and achieve our objectives in Afghanistan without making this change. That, too, has guided my decision.

I’ve just told my national security team that now is the time for all of us to come together. Doing so is not an option, but an obligation. I welcome debate among my team, but I won’t tolerate division. All of us have personal interests; all of us have opinions. Our politics often fuels conflict, but we have to renew our sense of common purpose and meet our responsibilities to one another, and to our troops who are in harm’s way, and to our country.

We need to remember what this is all about. Our nation is at war. We face a very tough fight in Afghanistan. But Americans don’t flinch in the face of difficult truths or difficult tasks. We persist and we persevere. We will not tolerate a safe haven for terrorists who want to destroy Afghan security from within, and launch attacks against innocent men, women, and children in our country and around the world.

So make no mistake: We have a clear goal. We are going to break the Taliban’s momentum. We are going to build Afghan capacity. We are going to relentlessly apply pressure on al Qaeda and its leadership, strengthening the ability of both Afghanistan and Pakistan to do the same.

That’s the strategy that we agreed to last fall; that is the policy that we are carrying out, in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

In that effort, we are honored to be joined by allies and partners who have stood by us and paid the ultimate price through the loss of their young people at war. They are with us because the interests and values that we share, and because this mission is fundamental to the ability of free people to live in peace and security in the 21st century.

General Petraeus and I were able to spend some time this morning discussing the way forward. I’m extraordinarily grateful that he has agreed to serve in this new capacity. It should be clear to everybody, he does so at great personal sacrifice to himself and to his family. And he is setting an extraordinary example of service and patriotism by assuming this difficult post.

Let me say to the American people, this is a change in personnel but it is not a change in policy. General Petraeus fully participated in our review last fall, and he both supported and helped design the strategy that we have in place. In his current post at Central Command, he has worked closely with our forces in Afghanistan. He has worked closely with Congress. He has worked closely with the Afghan and Pakistan governments and with all our partners in the region. He has my full confidence, and I am urging the Senate to confirm him for this new assignment as swiftly as possible.

Let me conclude by saying that it was a difficult decision to come to the conclusion that I’ve made today. Indeed, it saddens me to lose the service of a soldier who I’ve come to respect and admire. But the reasons that led me to this decision are the same principles that have supported the strength of our military and our nation since the founding.

So, once again, I thank General McChrystal for his enormous contributions to the security of this nation and to the success of our mission in Afghanistan. I look forward to working with General Petraeus and my entire national security team to succeed in our mission. And I reaffirm that America stands as one in our support for the men and women who defend it.

Thank you very much.
Also read:


Anonymous said...

Obama didn't fire McChrystal, he gave him an ultimatum.... resign or get dealt 1 blow from Chuck Norris....

Discount Coupons said...

The article also shows that McChrystal such a great person rather than president Barak Obama.

Wendy said...

Discount coupons

Maybe we did not read the same article. I thought it showed McChrsytal to be a vulgar, proud to be a wise guy, partying, self-centered man who lacked basic manners and was not even considerate of his own wife.

Anonymous said...

Discount Coupons

Are you for real?

Anonymous said...

He's human. The position he held, however, required him to be more than the average human.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

President Barack Hussein Obama did what the Taliban could not do, he removed a true warrior off the battlefield.

Yes General McChrsytal showed poor decision making in criticizing the current Administration but Wendy, DO NOT start spinning this.

Liberals tend to do this defending Obama. They forget the days of Clinton and Monica, (I wonder what Clinton thought of his wife while getting a bj in the oval office).

McChrsytal is a warrior and one of the best we had. Obama made a big mistake and it may very well cost us this war.

Wendy said...

Anonymous 2:12

There is no spin in the post above, just facts.

McChyrstal may have been a "true" warrior, but in this situation he had a big mouth and showed less common sense than a school boy. A "true" warrior should be able to strategize and demonstrate intelligence in all situations. It's not smart to attack the Commander in Chief to the world. Any president would take the same stand. Even McCain and other Republican leaders agreed it was the only move the president could take.

This is not a liberal or a right wing issue. I read the first four words of your post and knew it would be nonsense from another right wing parrot. Clinton and Monica have nothing to do with our president or this issue. The only spin is coming from you, and it's not spin, it's disconnected and silly attacks that lack merit.

Anonymous said...

obama blew it. his lack of leadership is incredible. what was funny is how firing of mckrstal was called "brilliant" by the left! LMAO It was a result of poor leadership.