June 29, 2010
The Supreme Court has agreed to take on the debate between state and federal governments' battle over immigration authority by looking at a 2007 Arizona law that penalizes employers who hire undocumented workers. The ruling may have an impact on the new controversial Arizona law, as well as the CNMI's overstepping law, PL17-1.
The USDoJ alleges that the Arizona law imposes stricter penalties on aliens than federal law does, and there are no provisions to prevent discrimination as there are in federal laws, which that could lead to employers refusing to hire minorities.
The San Francisco Chronicle reports:
The case that the justices will hear in the term that starts in October offers a preview of the legal clash over Arizona's newly enacted criminal penalties for migrants illegally present in the state. The Obama administration asked the court to review the Arizona employment law and has indicated it will sue to block enforcement of the state's broader immigration law, scheduled to take effect July 29.Arizona's newest evil law, which mirrors Pl 17-1, has been said to be broader than federal law and "violates the federal government's sole authority to regulate immigration." That law is being challenged by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Civil Liberties Union. There is an effort to get the U.S. Department of Justice to include the CNMI's PL 17-1 in any forthcoming lawsuits and a petition will be going online soon.
The issues in the two disputes vary somewhat, but both center on the extent of a state's authority to enforce immigration-related laws without intruding on exclusive federal power to regulate the nation's borders.
At least five other states have laws similar to Arizona's 2007 statute. It requires employers to determine their workers' immigration status through a federal database, and targets the business licenses of employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants - a license suspension for a first offense, revocation for a second offense.
A federal appeals court in San Francisco upheld the law last year as an exercise of a state's traditional power to regulate businesses. The court noted that federal law allows states to use business-licensing laws against employers of illegal immigrants.
But in arguments filed with the Supreme Court, the Obama administration said the Arizona law is a hiring ban, not a licensing law, and uses business licenses solely for punishment.
What is happening with PL 17-1, the CNMI's own version of the Arizona law?
There are reports from sources in the CNMI stating that the CNMI Department of Labor has a campaign to go after aliens and business owners who are not complying with their controversial provision requiring every alien in the CNMI to register with DOL to get a CNMI national identification card. We already know that the federal authorities have said that they would not recognize those cards and only valid umbrella permits and/or federally issued permits will be recognized.
DOL reportedly will be conducting business by business "inspections" to "interview" all aliens as to status. Reportedly, DOL has also stated that it would be conducting house by house "interviews" of all aliens. This sounds much like the warrantless raids on private barracks and houses carried out by then Secretary of the CNMI DOLI, Mark Zachares under Governor Tenorio and acting AG Maya Kara. How truly Gestapo-like. If the Fitial Administration is attempting to be known as the most anti-federal and lawless administration in the history of the CNMI, they probably already earned that honor without conducting these outrageous proposed acts.
It was also reported that Alcohol and Beverage Control and the CNMI Department of Commerce is denying renewal of alcohol licenses for any establishment that cannot prove that each of its alien employees has registered at DOL. Additionally, it has also been reported that the CNMI Department of Finance is refusing business license renewals for any business unless all foreign owners, operators and/or shareholders have foreign national identification cards.
Is it true that the federally funded CNMI Public School System will not register a foreign child who does not have a CNMI foreign national ID that is not recognized as valid by the federal government? Is it true that Nutritional Assistance and Medicaid are refusing services to any alien with US citizen children who does not have a DOL-issued foreign national identification card that is not recognized as valid by the federal government?
Is the CNMI national identification card just another attempt to fill empty coffers on the back of foreigners? Isn't this how the CNMI has prospered for years? First by using and abusing the garment workers and now with this desperate attempt to maintain control of immigration and the foreign workforce?
I am seeking testimony and documentation on all of the above reports. Please contact me by commenting on this site or through email: doromal@earthlink.net. (Your email will go to spam blocker unless I have corresponded with you previously. If you receive a message that you were blocked, just ask to be taken out of spam blocker.)
URGENT NOTICE TO FOREIGNERS: Parole in Place
Apparently, concern over DOL's threats and actions has resulted in a flood of parole in place applications.
The Ombudsman is receiving information from USCIS that it is overwhelmed by the sheer number of parole in place applications, which is delaying its processing of worthy requests for such status for aliens without umbrella permits and applications for advance parole. Aliens with umbrella permits will be denied parole in place by USCIS since the Federal government will not recognize any revocation of a permit by the CNMI after November 27, 2009. Aliens need to stop sending applications to Guam and if they have a question, they need to report to the Ombudsman office.





























