Don't Waste the Paper


August 30, 2010

The Marians Variety reported that an "optional survey" will be given to voters at the polls in November to allow voters to express their view on the DOI Report that was released in April 2010.  The report, which was mandated by PL 110-229, made recommendations on the status of the foreign workers.  The Fitial Administration and Covenant leadership voiced objections to the report, although none of them found time to submit their opinions over the two year period before it was due.

Who is going to tabulate these "surveys?"  According to the article, the Elections Commission is "not authorized to include such a question on the November ballot."  So who will oversee this survey? Let me guess - the Governor's Office or the Office of Indigenous Affairs?

Who will decide what questions are on the "survey" and how they are worded? Will "voters" write their name and addresses on the surveys? What oversight will there be to ensure that no one rigs the outcome to fit the agenda of the Administration and anti-federal leadership?

Can anyone place a survey at a polling place? Could other individuals print and have a separate survey/s?  How many surveys can government agencies or individuals offer at an election site?  Could supporters of the DOI Report conduct their own survey? Who determines this?

Where and how exactly will these surveys be handed out? After the person exits the voting both at the poll?   Are there regulations for distributing ballots, surveys, or questionnaires that are not supervised by the Commission of Elections?

The article said, "...the question will be in a separate paper and will serve as a “survey” that the governor will use as reference when he goes to Washington, D.C. again and testify on the status of guest workers in the CNMI."

I would like to hear how the governor justifies this survey as a true representation of the peoples' opinion.

Not Buying That This is Okay

August 28, 2010

More thoughts on the Attorney General and staff hosting a gathering for Covenant candidate Joseph Camacho at the governor's mansion.  Yesterday's post, Is This Okay?, questioned the ethics and legality of "Ed Buckingham, Attorney General and his office" hosting a campaign event at the governor's mansion. The event was announced on the Camacho campaign's facebook page.

It's obvious the Fitial Cabinet members, elected officials, and CNMI agency and department heads are hosting events for Covenant Party candidate Joseph Camacho, as is evidenced by the Camacho Campaign's Facebook page and newspaper articles detailing events.  The high level government offices and government employees "hosting" or "sponsoring" the Camacho campaign "rallies", "gatherings" or "meet and greets" include:

  • Attorney General Edward Buckingham and office
  • The Indigenous Affairs Office, Ike Demapan, Executive Director
  • The Carolinian Affairs Office and Angelica W. Iginoef-Mangarero, Special Assistant
  • Rota Mayor's Office and Melchor Mendiola, Mayor
  • Rota Municipal Council and Chairman, George Hocog
  • Melvin Faisao, Secretary of Community and Cultural Affairs 
  • Ester Fleming, Governor's Administrative Assistant
  • Dan Neilsen, Governor's Education Advisor
  • Joseph Villagomez, Secretary of the Department of Public Health
  • Tony Muna, Director of CUC
  • Dolores Aldan, Governor's Special Assistant for Political Affairs
  • Rita Chong, Administrator of Coastal Resources
  • Dr. Ignancio Dela Cruz, Secretary of the Department of Land and Natural Resources
  • Sandy Tudela, Commissioner, Department of Public Safety
  • Martin Sablan, Secretary, Public Works
  • Michael Ada, Secretary, Department of Commerce 
  • Angel Hocog, Executive Director,Commonwealth Council for Arts and Culture; 
  • Angel Demapan, Governor's Press Secretary
  • Rose Mondala, Director, Aging Office
  • Mariane Teregeyo, Public Liasion for the Department of Lands and Natural Resources
  • Remedio Buniag, Special Assistant to Women's Affairs
  • Sid Seman,  Director, Office of Personnel Management
  • Oscar Babauta, Secretary, Department of Public Lands
  • Ivan Blanco, Director, Department of Commerce's Central Statistics Division
  • Gary Camacho, Power Division Manager, CUC
  • Sylvan Igisomar, Director, Division of Fish and Wildlife
Also listed as hosting events for Camacho were Andrew Salas former Deputy Secretary of Labor,  WIC employee, Tony Gomez, Veterans Affairs Director, Jess Muna, Lucy C. Castro (affiliation unknown), and Keko Rosario (affiliation unknown).

 Anyone, whether a government employee or not, has the right to support any candidate of their choice, but they should be acting in a citizen capacity and not in a government employee capacity when they do so. They should be planning campaign events on their own time and with their own dime; not with government funds when they are clocked in at government offices.

The Office of the Public Auditor lists what political activities CNMI government employees are allowed and prohibited to participate in:

What kind of political activity is allowed?
A CNMI civil servant:
  • may vote for the candidate of his/her choice,
  • may express opinions on all political subjects and candidates,
  • may be a member of any political party, organization, or club, and
  • may make voluntary contributions to a political organization for its general expenditures.
What kind of political activity is prohibited?
Public officials or public employees:
1. shall not use public funds, time, personnel, or equipment for political activity unless that use is authorized by law or is incidental to a legally authorized or required activity. For example, they shall not at any time circulate any petition, including a nominating petition, in a government office,
2. shall not discharge, promote, demote, or change the status or compensation of any other official or employee or promise or threaten to do so:
  • for making or not making any contribution for a political objective,
  • because of the official's or employee's political actions or beliefs,
  • because of the official's or employee's failure to take any political action,
  • because of the official's or employee's support or non- support of a candidate seeking elective office, a political party, an initiative, or referendum.
3. shall not hand over to other officials or employees any money or other thing of value to promote any political objective.
4. shall not use their office or influence to:
  • interfere with an election, or affect its results, or
  • coerce the political action of any person or party.
5. shall not be obliged to contribute to any political fund or to render any political service nor will they be removed for refusing to do so.
6. shall not be pressured or coerced into political activities or support for political parties or candidates by threats to their employment.
7. shall not solicit or receive political contributions from anyone while on government time on government property, or in government offices.
8. shall not campaign for any candidate for public office during official working hours.
9. shall not promote or oppose legislation relating to programs of departments without the official sanction of the proper departmental authority. 
Neither a candidate for election, a public official, nor a public employee shall solicit or assess any contribution from any member in the Civil service.
Comments posted on this site and on the Marianas Variety indicate that CNMI voters are concerned about the fairness of the upcoming election for the delegate to the U.S. Congress.  The CNMI voter registration list on the CNMI Election Commission website contains the names of people who are deceased and who have not lived in the islands for years.  Some claim that Governor Fitial's many mainland off-island trips have included side-trips to solicit off-island votes to ensure Covenant candidate Camacho wins the election. Are the camapign  excursions like the recent one to Camacho's Rota camapaign event paid for by taxpayers? 


Here are some comments left on a previous post, Election Concerns:
Anonymous said...
Well, the recent elections give reason to be concerned about fraud right? Absentee ballots only go to "select" supporters? On Guam, absentee ballots are "received" by the liaison office, who is conveniently the notary, to process the voting (just to make sure); and who can forget the shenanigans by BenTan and what deals were made?
AUGUST 19, 2010 1:14 PM


Anonymous said...
200 of the ballots on Guam went to the same mailbox. Must be a really big family. Fitial administration also traveled to the US on the taxpayer dime to register select voters.
AUGUST 20, 2010 7:57 AM


Anonymous said...
11:05, yes, and I was told by one politician that every person that is "won over" from most families can mean about 70 subsequent votes. So look at how many "pardon's and sentence commutations" along with paroles and other "activities" that are being done by many in office. Stanley is a good example. Nothing done for the people, only for self interest and family and friends.
AUGUST 20, 2010 9:52 AM
In fact, using government equipment and time to plan and execute the campaign activities is a violation of CNMI law:
PL 8-11, 1 ( 8434); amended by PL 8-28, 3.
8534. Restraints on Use of Public Supplies, Services, Time, and Personnel for Campaign Activities.
(a) A public official or public employee shall not use public funds, time, personnel, or equipment for the public official or public employees private gain or that of another unless the use is authorized by law.
(b) A public official or public employee shall not use public funds, time, personnel, or equipment for political or campaign activity unless the use is:
(1) Authorized by law; or
(2) Properly incidental to another activity required or authorized by law.
(c) The Public Auditor may adopt rules specifying examples of political or campaign activity permissible or not permissible under this section.
How many of the government officials and government offices that are hosting or sponsoring Camacho campaign events have used their offices, equipment and time to conduct campaign activities such as sending emails to co-workers to invite them to campaigns for Camacho in violation of the law? Perhaps some of them have, perhaps all of them have.  It was suggested that the Indigenous Affairs, Carolinian Affairs and Aging Offices have in this or previous campaigns.  We know for sure that the Office of the Attorney General has.

OAG Campaign Email 
On Thursday, August 19, 2010, 10:30AM (during working hours) Freida Demapan, Executive Assistant to the Attorney General, sent an email to all of the CNMI Assistant Attorney Generals and staff stating:

Good Morning You All!


I am taking this upon myself to inform you all that our Attorney General, Edward T. Buckingham, and the Office of Attorney General as a whole, will be hosting a gathering for Joe Camacho on Saturday, August 28, 2010 starting at 4:30 p.m. at the Governor's House. As our AG has said, this gathering is not mandatory, but it would be nice to see our attorneys and staff come and enjoy the food, drinks and view and be able to socialize with other people throughout the night while this gathering is ongoing.


As a courtesy, I am humbly asking if you could inform me whether you are going to this gathering just so I can get a head count. I can be reached at either 664-2364 or my cell phone at ------------ or just email me.


thanks all so much.


Frieda R. Demapan
Executive Assistant to the Attorney General
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
Saipan, MP 96950
Phone: (670) 664-2364 Fax: (670) 234-7016
Cellular Phone: (670)---------------
That email correspondence presumed to be conducted on government equipment, on government time, sent to fellow government employees appears to be an unlawful political campaign activity carried out in the very office that should be enforcing and upholding law. 

It  falls under the "political activity that is prohibited" as listed on the OPA website and cited in this post above: "1. shall not use public funds, time, personnel, or equipment for political activity unless that use is authorized by law or is incidental to a legally authorized or required activity and 8. shall not campaign for any candidate for public office during official working hours."

Who will ensure a fair election in the CNMI? Should or can federal officials be tasked with overseeing the upcoming election? Or should or can they investigate allegations of unlawful campaigning that is happening now?



UPDATE: The Marianas Variety has an article on this story in today's paper by reporter Andrew De Guzman:
This reporter tried to cover the event on Saturday evening but was told it was a “private gathering.”

Gov. Benigno R. Fitial was heard telling the audience to “stay united.”

Camacho, for his part, thanked Fitial and Buckingham for hosting the event.

There were more or less 30 vehicles in the parking lot.

The Camacho for Congress Facebook account announced the gathering on Friday morning: “[T]he Attorney General and his staff are hosting our Candidate for U.S. Delegate Joseph Norita Camacho. The meet and greet will be at the CNMI Gov. Fitial’s residence in Gualo Rai. Please come and join us.”

At about 2:30 p.m., the announcement on the Facebook page was removed.
The page and the box of events sponsored by government officials was screen-captured as a pdf file, so removed or not there is evidence that it was on the public campaign page. The campaign page "invites everyone" and then tells the reporter that it is a "private gathering?" Interesting.

Saipan Tribune reporter, Haidee V. Eugenio, also covered this story. Both Congressman Gregorio (Kilili) Sablan and Republican candidate Juan Babauta expressed concerns with the Attorney General and his office hosting such an event:
Delegate Gregorio Kilili C. Sablan, when asked for comment, said the attorney general should not have hosted Camacho's campaign event.

“Given that the attorney general and his office are entrusted by law to provide counsel on the conduct of the election to ensure that polling occurs in a manner that protects the individual interest of every voter as well as the interest of the Commonwealth as a whole in the integrity of the ballot, for him to have aligned himself in any manner-but particularly in one so overt as that advertised by Camacho-would be a grave breach of faith with the public he serves and an abrogation of his oath of office,” Sablan told Saipan Tribune.

...Sablan, who is seeking re-election, previously served as executive director of the Commonwealth Election Commission.

“Having served 10 years with the Commonwealth Election Commission, I could never have imagined that the attorney general would do something that would ever so undermine our faith in the Commonwealth government and the rule of law here in the Northern Mariana Islands,” he added.

Former governor Juan N. Babauta, who is running for the delegate seat, shared the same concern about Buckingham's participation in an election campaign.

“As the chief law enforcement of the land, it is unfortunate that he's mixing his very important role as attorney general and politics,” Babauta said in a phone interview.

Immigration Reform Moving Forward

















August 28, 2010

"It is this constant flow of immigrants that help make America what it is...To this day America reaps incredible economic rewards because we remain a magnet for the best and brightest for people around the world. In a increasingly interconnected world....Being an American is not a matter of blood or birth it is a matter of faith." President Barack Obama

While Republicans stand firm as roadblocks to comprehensive immigration reform, the Obama Administration is pushing some reform through policy. An August 20, 2010 memo from John T. Morton, Assistant Secretary for Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, encourages the release of illegal immigrants detainees if the immigrants have a potential path to legal residency.  As many as 17,000 illegal immigrants could be affected by the new policy.  These include those who entered the U.S. illegally and those who overstayed their visas.

The move is the result of a huge backlog of cases that are clogging prisons and courtrooms and the shift to focus on deporting those who pose a risk to national security and are criminal aliens.

The action has been lauded by immigration advocates as it reflects humane immigration policies and will  help to keep families united.

Last week the DHS released its annual report, Immigration Enforcement Actions: 2009.  Despite anti-immigrants rants that federal government is not doing its job in removing criminal aliens (think Arizona lawsuit), the report shows that the removal of  illegal aliens has been increasing annually for seven years.

An earlier John Morton memo issued June 30, 2010, Civil Immigration Enforcement: Priorities for the Apprehension, Detention, and Removal of Aliens, states that ICE has the resources to remove 400,000 illegal aliens a year, which is less than 4% of the estimated illegal in the U.S. The memos states:
ICE must prioritize the use of its enforcement personnel, detention space, and removal resources to ensure that the removals the agency does conduct promote the agency's highest enforcement priorities, namely national security, public safety, and border security.
On September 15th there will be a gathering of people of faith and community leaders in Washington, DC who will tell the stories of the families torn apart by the 1,100 deportations taking place each day in the United States. The gathering called Relief, Reform and Respect, is expected to draw supporters of comprehensive immigration reform from across the nation.

Is This Okay?

August 27, 2010

Four candidates are running for the CNMI U.S. delegate seat: current Congressman Gregorio (Kilili) Sablan (Independent),  Attorney Joseph Camacho (Covenant), former Governor Juan Babauta (Republican) and former Lt. Governor Jess Borja (Democrat).

In the CNMI, lines between election campaign money and government money are often blurred. Lines between government department and agency involvement in campaigns are often crossed.  You may remember the allegations that food from the federally funded Man'amko Center was used at Fitial's campaign rallies last year. (Did the governor ever file his campaign report for last year's governor's race?)

Last month the CNMI Office of Indigenous Affairs and the Office of Carolinian Affairs sponsored (and we assume paid for) a rally , which newspaper also called a campaign rally attended by Covenant candidate Joe Camacho, and Republican candidate Juan Babauta, both Carolinians.

There have been other controversies in this year's election season. A Camacho campaign party held at American Memorial Park earlier this year resulted in the campaign manager, ex-felon Felix Nogis, being arrested for littering.  It seems the group left truckloads of garbage that park rangers had to clean up. Attorney Joseph Camacho represented Nogis in the U.S. District Court of the NMI where he was found guilty of littering a federal park.

Now more controversy is brewing. The Camacho for Congress Facebook page reveals that the Attorney General "and his office" are sponsoring a Camacho campaign "gathering" at the governor's mansion.


(From Joseph Camacho Facebook Page)
.


















Will the Office of the Attorney General will be consulted if there are improprieties in the election or will the U.S. Attorney Office be consulted?  Isn't this a conflict of interest?  Many assume that Buckingham is in the Governor's pocket, but isn't this taking things a little too far?

The Facebook page clearly states: "August 27, 6:00PM - 9:30PM Hosted by Attorney General Ed Buckingham and his office."

An earlier Facebook post on Camacho's page indicated that the event will take place at the governor's mansion. After someone made a comment, the post was removed, but it read:
"Camacho for Congress Saturday. Committee members and Supporters will going out into the Community to continue our House to House Visits. Also, the Attorney General and his staff are hosting our Candidate for U.S. Delegate Joseph Norita Camacho. The meet and greet will be at the CNMI Gov. Fitial's residence in Gualo Rai. Please come and join us."
Is the AG's office paying for this gala with CNMI funds? Is this ethical? How can a government office support a particular candidate at the governor's mansion? Isn't the governor's mansion owned by the people of the CNMI or is it a personal house. Do public funds pay for electricity, maintenance, anything?

The CNMI Election Law states (emphasis added):
6705. Unlawful Campaign Activities.
(a) No person may use the name of the government department or agency to campaign for or express support for a candidate running for public office; nor shall the buying or selling of fundraising materials in support of candidates for public office take place in any government building or facility.
(b) All campaign posters shall be removed from public places by the candidate no later than fifteen days after the election date.
(c) No campaign materials, or hard board, used as a poster, may be attached to any telephone pole, fire hydrant or tree on public property.
Any person who knowingly and willfully violates any provision of this section shall, upon conviction, be fined $500.
Source: PL 12-18, 2 (6705); (a), (b), and (c) repealed in entirety and subsequent sections (d), (e), and (f) redesignated as (a), (b), and (c), respectively, by PL 15-52, 3.
Commission Comment: Public Law 15-52 took effect on April 11, 2007. See the comment to 1 CMC 6528 regarding PL 15-52.
It seems to me when the Office of Indigenous Affairs or Carolinian Affairs Office sponsor a campaign it is a violation of the law.  Maybe that is blurred because it was also a "rally" to bash the federal government.  But certainly the event "hosted by Attorney General Ed Buckingham and his office" at the governor's mansion is a violation of the CNMI election law. Nothing seems blurred there. But, of course, I am not an attorney, but AG Buckingham, "his office" (assuming that "office" means AAGs and staff, not his actual office space), and Attorney Joseph Camacho are attorneys. Well, what do you think?

Tracking Aliens Fitial Style

August 26, 2010

Despite the fact that the CNMI no longer has control over immigration and has absolutely no funds, Governor Fitial announced that the local government is proposing a new local tacking system to better "track overstayers or illegal aliens on the islands, for referral to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for deportation."

This sounds like another ploy for the CNMI to maintain control of the local system -the dysfunctional system that was so broken that the U.S. Congress enacted PL110-229 to apply federal immigration law to the CNMI.

The DOL and AG can't even accept that they no longer maintain control over umbrella permits, now they want to track aliens?

The reasons for the proposal were stated by the Fitial Administration's press secretary as reported in the Saipan Tribune:
“In view of the federal government's refusal to provide this information to the Commonwealth, we had no choice but to amend our Customs regulations to provide the legal basis for obtaining this data in a timely fashion so that it can be used by our BMS [Border Management System] organization to support our local laws,” Demapan told Saipan Tribune.

He added, “Without this information, the Commonwealth would be unable to produce the regular reports regarding illegal overstayers in the Commonwealth [that] are provided to the DHS authorities responsible [for] instituting removal/deportation proceedings against such aliens who no longer are entitled to remain in the Commonwealth.”

Since the federal takeover of local immigration, Demapan said the CNMI has been getting exit and entry information through Customs officers manning the airport exit station and taking the necessary information from incoming passengers as they are processed at the terminal.

The information is then made available to the CNMI's BMS directed by the LIIDS office at the Department of Labor.

Demapan said Gov. Benigno R. Fitial directed this process in order to ensure that the CNMI government has the necessary data to enforce its own labor laws and to continue to have the capacity to identify which incoming aliens have overstayed the permits authorizing them to enter the Commonwealth.

“Nothing that the Commonwealth has done in this regard has interfered in any respect with the ability of the federal government to regulate immigration into, and exit from, the Commonwealth. However, after some months of experience with the new Customs procedures, we became aware of the desirability to find another way to get the incoming information in a more efficient way that would not burden our incoming visitors,” he said.
The GAO Report issued in May 2010 clearly stated that it was the CNMI refusing to share information saying, "DHS efforts to gain direct access to the CNMI’s immigration databases have been unsuccessful, hampering U.S. enforcement operations."

See this previous post: GAO Report Reveals CNMI is Hampering Transition to Federalization for a detailed explanation of the CNMI's effort to block federal access to databases and more.

National Endowment of the Arts Paints a Poor Picture of CNMI's Grants Management

August 26, 2010

The Office of the Inspector General filed a "Limited Scope Audit Report" on the NEA Grants to the Commonwealth Council on Arts and Culture (CCAC) that revealed serious violations of federal law and misuse of federal funds.

The CCAC is headed by Angel S. Hocog and falls under the Department of Community and Cultural Affairs, which is headed by Secretary Melvin Faisao.

The audited stated that during the period under review, the Council had five NEA grants active with awards totaling $1,012,020, with 4 audited ones showing misuse of funds. The NEA grants are funded by U.S. tax dollars.

The audit reported:
Some of these conditions which may impact NEA’s funding were noncompliance with requirements regarding allowable costs/cost principles and activities, cash management, equipment management, prohibitions concerning awards to excluded parties, procurement and reporting requirements, and matching level of effort and eligibility requirements.
The audit cited mismanagement and potential conflict of interest stating:
Indicators of mismanagement and conflict of interest were identified in each of the grants we reviewed. The Council awarded grants to ineligible recipients and organizations such as former and current government and Council employees as well as Board members. We also found that grants were awarded to an employee who neither applied nor received award funds. Additionally, expenses were also charged for travel, per diems and stipends for ineligible recipients. 
...we noted several grants were awarded to an employee, in the amount of $18,350, charged to both the NEA grant and matching portions. However, the employee stated that they did not apply nor receive any of these awards, with the exception of a grant in the amount of $300.00 for teaching traditional coconut weaving. We also reviewed a copy of an award check made payable to the same employee, addressed to the employee at the Council’s P.O. Box, however it was picked up by someone other than the employee. Therefore, we are recommending that NEA disallow the following costs charged to the grants, reducing the total outlays reported by the indicated amounts for each grant:
Not suprisingly, the audit revealed that grants were improperly awarded to relatives and politically connected employees:
...we found the Council made several awards and payments to ineligible award recipients and companies such as former and current employees, employees of the CNMI Office of the Governor, relatives, Council Board members and companies owned by relatives.
The audit also revealed that the Council claimed unallowable costs including food, hotel expenses and the purchase of vehicles. Furthermore, the Council did not maintain employee personnel records and activity reports as required by the terms of the grants.

The audit report stated:
A telephone conference was also held with Council officials on August 16, 2010. They acknowledged and generally agreed with the findings and recommendations made to the Council, and indicated they were in agreement on implementing the recommendations.
The $574,707 spent on personnel activity was also questioned.

In January 2010, the Saipan Tribune reported that acting Arts Council Director stated the Council was suffering for money:
In an earlier interview with Arts Council acting executive director Vince Rabauliman, he had said the council is still reviewing plans to relocate the gallery to Garapan, where most tourists congregate. Rabalulimas said that due to the funding shortage, the council was unable to move the exhibit to another location last year.

“We want to move it around.but we're hampered by the funding shortage. We don't have enough money to pay for the rent. That's why we're seeking the community help by helping us with the space for our exhibits,” he added.
On Tuesday of this week, current CCAC Director Angel S. Hocog asked Saipan and Northern Islands Legislative Delegation chair Rep. Ray A. Tebuteb (R-Saipan) for $30,000 to pay for past bills from the Flame Tree Arts Festival and the upcoming Guam Micronesian Fair scheduled for October 2010. CCAC budget woes were also discussed in a July 2010 article:
Hocog said they are still waiting for funding from the National Endowment for the Arts.

He added that preparations for three of the biggest arts festival in the region have already been initiated as well.
It would not be wise to wait for any funding from the National Endowment of Arts. The audit report is suggesting that the CNMI could be forced to return misspent funds totaling $337,666.  I think U.S. taxpayers would appreciate the misspent funds being returned in lieu of budget woes.

The audit report recommended that NEA:
  •  Disallow the unallowable costs charged to the grants in the amount of $141,049, reducing the total outlays reported by the indicated amounts for each grant (For details see Appendices B and C).
  • Consider the Council a “high-risk” grant recipient in accordance with 45 C.F.R. § 1174.12, (2) deem the Council ineligible to apply for or receive NEA awards.
  • Terminate all funding, including any suspended awards, until such time as the Council (1) has implemented corrective actions to address the findings of this report, (2) provide NEA with evidence of improvements in its management of Federal grants, and (3) NEA reinstates the Council’s eligibility to apply for and receive awards.
  • Consider placing the Council on the Cost Reimbursement method of funding (as directed by the Grants and Contracts Office); if, in the future, NEA reinstates the Council’s eligibility to apply for and receive awards.

Concert for Violy

Violy
August 24, 2010

Press Release from United Workers Movement and FILCOWA:

Subject: Violeta Lapuz

Dear Sir/ Madame/ Friends/ at mga Kababayan,

Violy Lupuz, a former entertainer/singer and wife of her perennial partner, Walden Beri was diagnosed by CHC M.D. Dr. John Yarofalir with a “right breast mass” in 2009. (See attached Referral Letter)

She was referred by Dr. Yarofalir to go to the Philippines for treatment last year upon the diagnosis, but due to financial constraints she was not able to go. At that time the tumor size in her breast was 2 cm. A fundraising campaign was launched last year so Violy could follow the doctor’s advise, but it did not succeed due to lack of backing and support.

In spite of her sickness, we can see Violy exposing a sweet smile at us as she ignores her sickness as the days pass, quietly enduring the pain that she is suffering.

Now the critical stage has come, and we hope that it won’t be too late because the tumor that was found has grown to 5 cm, and reddish fluid is leaking from her breast.

She is in need of immediate medical attention as was the doctor’s advice since last year.  She is also in need of our tender help. By God’s grace Violy was finally able to go home to the Philippines on August 15, 2010 (see attached ticket) through the help of Mrs. Ofel Atalig who sponsored her by providing a one way ticket to the Philippines.

However, there is no money for her medication, and she needs an operation as soon as possible.

Our friends, we are appealing to your kind hearts for a financial help on behalf of Sister Violy Lapuz and her family. Many times she has been united to our common cause, and consequently we believe that in this crucial time, you will stand with her. Your help and support to our kababayan is our treasure, so please share your love.

Saturday, August 28, 2010 
5:00 to 9:00 PM
the family of Walden Beri, husband of Violy Lapuz, will be holding
“A CONCERT FOR A CAUSE” 
at American Memorial Park Amphitheater
 Garapan, Saipan 

The main performer of this concert will be Walden Beri and his son Dhen. This is a live concert with some guest performers like Patz and Badjhe, Mary Anne Alovera, Past and Present Syndicate Band and other surprise guests.


You can contact us for your help and donations: 285-3306 (Rabby Syed), 285-9255 (Ronnie Doca), Walden at 286-6185, Cathlyn Beri -286-6368, Dhen 286-4171.

Thank you very much and we appreciate so much your help and support.

Homeless in Saipan

August 23, 2010

The tragic story of the 7-member Saluta family that was camping out at Susupe Beach after being evicted from their apartment may sadly be just the first of many more similar stories yet to come.  As more businesses close and more applicants vie for the few remaining jobs, there could be a growing number of individuals and families who find themselves homeless in the CNMI.  This is certainly the trend in parts of the U.S. and in many places worldwide as the economy remains stalled across the globe.

The Saipan Tribune reported:
The family has survived through food stamps and through the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program.

On Jan. 15, 2010, from a small house in Fina Sisu they moved to the Ebetuen Apartment in Chalan Kanoa after they received benefits from the housing aid program given by the Northern Marianas Protection and Advocacy Systems Inc. The housing benefits, however, expired on Aug. 15, 2010.

Mr. Saluta said as some of the apartment staff were pressuring them to leave after Aug. 15, they had no choice but to find temporary shelter at Susupe Beach Park.

He said two police officers went to the apartment and gave them three days to pack their belongings.

Mr. Saluta said his wife is afraid of the police so they decided to pack up yesterday.

The couple said they were actually planning to move to another house, but that the current occupant is still waiting for his child tax and cannot move out.

The couple said they heard that NMPASI gave other families housing benefits for 18 months so they were hoping that the agency could also provide them such terms.

Mr. Saluta said since they could not find jobs they were thinking of going back to the Philippines.

He said they, however, are considering the situation of their children if they will take them to the Philippines.
I don't blame the family for trying to hang on to see if jobs are offered to CNMI foreign workers for the military buildup on Guam, or if status is granted to long-term workers. The husband has worked in the NMI since 1997 and the wife since 1994. Obviously the CNMI is their home and they may be in a worse situation in the Philippines where the job prospects are even more scarce.

The family should contact NMPASI to clarify with what determines the length of benefits a client receives.   Maybe the family also qualifies for an extension. Additionally, the owner of Aqualite who owes Mr. Salute back wages needs to pay him those wages immediately.   Mr. Saluta may also want to go to the federal ombudsman office to ask about parole in place that is available for  some who were denied umbrella permits.

There are no homeless shelters in the CNMI except for Guma Esperansa which caters to victims of domestic violence and human trafficking.  There is also a very small social services network in the CNMI to address the problems of the hungry and homeless. Karidat, the Salvation Army and the Northern Marianas Protection and Advocacy Systems Inc. (NMPASI) are among the few in existence. Filipinos also may qualify to receive assistance from the Philippine Consulate. Still once a needy person or family receives the maximum benefits for which they qualify, they are out of luck.

I have worked with Orlando agencies that serve the homeless for 14 years.  While monetary collections and donations of food help to fill the immediate needs of shelter, food and medical care, I know that ultimately the best assistance that a homeless person could receive is help in securing a permanent job.

Generous Hearts
Both the Saipan Tribune and Marianas Variety stated that caring community members and organizations were donating directly to the family.  The Variety reported that former NMC president Dr. Carmen Fernandez is assisting the family to locate organizations that will assist.  She also helped connect the family with the Sun Hotel which is providing three days of free accommodations. Reportedly, Ben Sablan of Ben Enterprises offered a house, Tony Rogolifoi of the Saipan Mayor's Office offered a house, and a representative of Tan Holding offered shelter at the Finasisu Airport Hotel.

Perhaps the most touching story was reported by the Saipan Tribune:
Segundo Castro, a veteran who is now based in California, called Saipan Tribune yesterday morning and offered his house in Kagman for free.

Castro, a local resident, said he was deployed to Olongapo in the Philippines for six months in 1990 where he was treated well.

“They were very nice to me and I want to give back to them,” Castro said.
What a beautiful sentiment!

The generosity of the community is truly heart warming. Still what will happen if there are ten homeless families, or 20, or 30, or more? How will their needs be met?  I hope that the community is considering this and making plans to meet future needs as the economic outlook remains bleak.

None of the newspapers articles or emails that I received said where to send money for the family. Setting up a legitimate trust fund for the family would provide a secure way of collecting money and would eliminate any worries about where the money will end up.

I hope tomorrow the papers report that someone offered the parents jobs. Now that would be a happy ending.

Help Pakistan's Flood Victims















August 21, 2010

The worst flood to hit Pakistan in 80 years has leftover 15 million people homeless. FIFTEEN MILLION! That equals the combined population of the states of Maryland, Wisconsin and South Carolina.

The American Red Cross is desperately appealing to individuals to please donate to help flood victims. UNICEF reports that serious fund raising shortfalls are hampering their ability to help. From the UNICEF press release:
Statement by UNICEF Executive Director, Anthony Lake, on the flooding in Pakistan

NEW YORK/GENEVA/ISLAMABAD, 20 August 2010 – “Mothers fleeing flooded homes with nothing but their babies clinging to their backs; people waving for help from the top of houses and sheds as the waters rise around them; desperately thirsty children drinking from contaminated water sources. The disaster has reached tragic proportions. But serious shortfalls in funding are limiting our ability to save lives as the crisis worsens.

The scale of the disaster in Pakistan caused by heavy monsoon rains and floods is massive. One-fifth of the country is now underwater, and entire villages have been swept away. Some 900,000 dwellings have been damaged or destroyed. 15.4 million people have been affected by the floods.

The consequences of the flooding for Pakistan’s poorest and most vulnerable people are very serious. And the most vulnerable of all, the children, are at the greatest risk. Unless the world responds immediately, more and more of the 3.5 million children affected by the floods will be at risk of contracting deadly water-borne diseases like dysentery, diarrhea and cholera.

Together with our partners, UNICEF is currently supplying clean water to some 1.5 million people every day, and re-uniting separated children with their families. We are working with WHO to ward off serious health threats by vaccinating thousands of children in receiving centres and camps, and we are working alongside WFP to distribute supplementary high energy food to children under five.

But these efforts are insufficient to meet even the current needs of millions of displaced families. With floodwaters rising, evacuations continuing and more rains expected, the potential for even greater tragedy grows by the minute.

The need for greatly increased support could not be more urgent. Once the most pressing needs are met, significant and sustained support will help to rebuild schools, restore infrastructure and re-establish child protection measures. But first, we must save lives.

UNICEF urges the global donor community to help us protect the children of Pakistan and to ensure that the floods which have destroyed their homes do not also destroy their futures.”
Water borne disease is responsible for many of the fatalities. The New York Times reports:
Right now, more than 30,000 people are suffering from water- and hygiene-related infections like acute diarrhea — which is easily treated under good conditions but potentially fatal during emergencies like this. There is an urgent need for clean water and sanitation facilities, as well as soap and other hygiene supplies. Oxfam is responding to these needs, but the resources currently available now only cover a fraction of what is required.
For a list of relief agencies accepting donations for Pakistan's flood victims click HERE.

Cutting the Pie

August 19, 2010


One book my children loved when they were young was Gator Pie by Louise Matthews. Two alligators find a marshmallow chocolate pie on a picnic table and they decide to divide it in half to share.  As more and more alligators come to the table, the pieces get smaller and smaller as the slices are divided fairly to include all.  Finally, while the other gators are fighting over which piece is bigger, the two gators sneak the pie into the swamp and eat it all by themselves.


The book reminds me of the CNMI House's budget that passed this week.  The decision-makers seem to have taken a greater piece of the already small pie to the detriment of all many programs including the Public School System and the Northern Marianas College. Also, perilously slashed was the judiciary's budget.


 Lawmakers voted shamelessly to give themselves an enormous increase in their already bloated discretionary fund budget.  At the same time, they are calling for all government employees to take major pay cuts (up to 16 hour work cuts per pay period), and the government has had to borrow money to pay for CUC fuel and government employees' salaries. The audacity is amazing!


Lawmakers voted to increase their discretionary funding from $86,796 to $130,000 or a $43,204 increase per legislator.  That increase could pay for the salaries of two government employees, help to pay for instructional materials and supplies for the public schools, pay for fuel for CUC, purchase supplies for the CHC, or be used to fund a variety of critical services.


The legislators also earn $39,300 annually.  It is clear where the priority lies in the minds of those who voted to pass this budget -with themselves. This chart from the Saipan Tribune that breaks down the budget.


Will the low budget allocation for PSS affect federal funding? Will the low budget allocation for NMC jeopardize its accreditation?


The vote was 12-7 in favor of the budget legislation, with all of the Covenant members voting for a personal raise, while ignoring the budget crisis and critical services.


Those who voted for the bill were Speaker Froilan C. Tenorio, Covenant-Saipan, House Floor Leader George N. Camacho, Ind.-Saipan, Vice Speaker Felicidad T. Ogumoro, Covenant-Saipan, Reps. Frederick P. Deleon Guerrero, Ind.-Saipan, Ramon S. Basa, Covenant-Saipan, Stanley T. Torres, Ind.-Saipan, Raymond D. Palacios, Covenant-Saipan, Teresita A. Santos, Ind.-Rota, Eliceo D. Cabrera, R-Saipan, Sylvestre I. Iguel, Covenant-Saipan, Ralph S. Demapan, Covenant-Saipan, and Trenton B. Conner, R-Tinian.


Those who voted against the bill were House minority leader Diego Benavente's Republican-Saipan and Saipan Republican Reps. Joseph P. Deleon Guerrero, Ramon A. Tebuteb, Francisco S. Dela Cruz, Antonio P. Sablan, Ray N. Yumul and Joseph M. Palacios.


Rep. Edmund S. Villagomez, Covenant-Saipan was not present for the vote.


Rep. Diego Benavente showed that he has integrity and respect for the people of the CNMI. The Saipan Tribune reported:
Benavente, as well as Dela Cruz, said it's “irresponsible for the majority bloc to ram the budget bill down some members' throats” without having substantive debate on it.


Benavente was particularly disappointed with the majority's successful attempts to end debate on the bill, even before other members could introduce floor amendments to what they described as an unbalanced budget and one that gives budget increases to lawmakers while asking many government employees to swallow up to 25 percent salary cuts. He said the bill would force 80 to 64 work hour cuts per pay period, and unpaid holidays.


His defeated written floor amendments include stopping lawmakers from giving themselves $130,000 in discretionary fund, increasing the Judiciary's funding by $650,000, and giving NMC an additional $621,188 for the college to meet the maintenance-of-effort agreement between the U.S. Department of Education and the CNMI governor.


The Board of Education, given a zero budget in previous versions of the bill, will now be given $164,328 but this will be taken from the Public School System's budget, resulting in PSS getting just $29,967,694.


Benavente's amendment got only eight “yes” votes, while 11 voted “no.”


“It's a major disappointment. It's an irresponsible action. We're not only underfunding NMC but also jeopardizing its accreditation,” Benavente said in an interview after the session.


Benavente, who served for almost 20 years as a lawmaker, said he has never seen such “dirty politics” in a long time.


Republicans accused the majority of blocking attempts to debate on the bill and to make amendments.
I just don't understand how the CNMI legislators could justify their salaries and "discretionary funds" even before the hefty increase. It's not like they are lawmakers in a state where there are millions of people.  The lowest paying state legislators' salaries are: Louisiana ($16,800), Arkansas ($15,869), Rhode Island ($14,019), North Carolina ($13,951), Nebraska ($12,000), South Carolina ($10,400), Mississippi ($10,000) and New Mexico, Texas and Utah  — where legislators earn no salary at all. Every one of these states has over a million people in population and Texas comes in at an estimated 24,782,302.    Compare those to the CNMI's $39,300 legislator salary.


California legislators make the most - $95,291, but the salary may not be so far out of proportion considering the population of the state (estimated at 36,961,664 in 2009) and enormous scope of the job. This is one of four full-time state legislatures. 


Many state legislatures meet part time, which is also a consideration in figuring salary. (Here is a chart showing which state legislatures meet full-time, part-time or somewhere in between.)  Surely the sparsely populated CNMI should be able to function just fine with a part-time legislature while meeting the needs of the people.


I thought maybe the state legislators with smaller salaries get huge discretionary funds.  It doesn't look that way. Let's look at North Carolina.  A July 2010 article from the North Carolina Times News states that the North Carolina legislators (120 House members and 50 Senators) have not had a raise since the mid-1990s.  With all allowances (discretionary funds) their total annual salary is $20,659 a year. That includes the annual salary of $13,951, monthly expenses of $559, and a subsistence allowance of $104 for when they are in session. North Carolina has an estimated population of 9,380,884.

Compare the state legislators' salaries to their populations, and it looks like CNMI legislators are eating from the trough at the expense of all the citizens and non-citizens who call the CNMI home. Are they dividing the pie thinking, "Two for me, one for you; three for me, none for you?" 



CNMI citizens are planning on holding a silent protest  today outside the Legislature on Capital Hill from 11:30 am -12:30 pm.  I hope they get a large crowd.


I guess next time I find fault with my state's budget, I'll have to remind myself it could be worse -it could be as skewed as the CNMI's. The CNMI has to have the highest salary and discretionary fund account per legislator for all U.S. states and territories in  relationship to its population.



Read HB 17-96

Election Concerns

August 18, 2010

Some readers of this blog have voiced concerns about the upcoming election, suggesting that it may be subject to election fraud.  They expressed concern particularly with the early voting and hand counting of ballots.  Are their concerns valid?

Here are some of the comments:
Anonymous said...
Sorry. Totally off the subject.

Anybody else think it is weird that Joe Camacho the Covenant flag bearer is not heavily campaigning?

Look at MVariety.com and SaipanTribune.com and he is the only one with no banner ads. Run down the main roads and he only has 18"x 11" placards every 2 or 4 miles and he is the only one with no main big boards.

I can only imagine he is either not trying to win or more than likely he believes he has this in the bag already.

How? I believe that they are rigging this election. They have already brought about a bunch of big changes such as manual hand counting not electronic, changing voting polling locations, altering law to allow for absentee ballots without notary, early voting procedures, etc.

I know this is a federal election but will we really have federal oversight? At what level? Will they allow election observers to "observe" from 20 feet away during manual counts while CEC is altering ballots with white stickers and black ones?

Anyone have any more to add?
August 17, 2010 5:40 PM
____________________________
Anonymous said...
Noni 5:40 The time to ask for federal observers is now. Ask the DoJ to lead you in the right direction.

August 17, 2010 8:39 PM
____________________________
Anonymous said...
5:40, this "election reform" to allow up to ten day early voting, along with what you have stated got me thinking along your same lines. Especially the early voting and the hand count.
I agree with 8:40.also.

August 18, 2010 10:13 AM
The upcoming CNMI election is a federal election, and federal voting laws apply. The U.S. Department of Justice often sends observers to oversee elections. During the 2008 elections over 800 observers from the DOJ's Civil Rights Division were sent to 23 states to oversee elections.

The Department of Justice website has a Voting Section with questions and answers. Here are some that may interest those who commented here:
What federal law protects me from discrimination in voting?

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 protects every American against racial discrimination in voting. This law also protects the voting rights of many people who have limited English skills. It stands for the principle that everyone's vote is equal, and that neither race nor language should shut any of us out of the political process. You can find the Voting Rights Act in the United States Code at 42 U.S.C. 1973 to 1973aa-6. 
What are federal observers?

Federal observers are authorized by Section 8 of the Voting Rights Act to attend and observe voting and vote-counting procedures during elections. They are non-lawyers, hired and supervised by the federal Office of Personnel Management (OPM). They are trained by OPM and by the Justice Department to watch, listen, and take careful notes of everything that happens inside the polling place during an election, and are also trained not to interfere with the election in any way. They prepare reports that may be filed in court, and they can serve as witnesses in court if the need arises.

How do I get federal observers to monitor an election?

You can contact the Voting Section and explain where the need exists, what needs to be observed, and which minority voters are affected. We consider many such requests each year from organizations and individuals. The Attorney General can send federal observers to any jurisdiction covered by Section 5 or by a court order.

What responsibilities does the Justice Department have with regard to voter fraud or intimidation?

The administration of elections is chiefly a function of state government. However, federal authorities may become involved in election fraud matters when a state prosecutor asks for federal assistance. In cases where intimidation, coercion, or threats are made or attempts to intimidate, threaten or coerce are made to any person for voting or attempting to vote, federal civil voting rights claims may be brought by the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division. In such cases where voters are intimidated, coerced, threatened or oppressed or attempts are made to do these acts based on race, color, religion, or national origin, federal criminal charges may be brought by the Criminal Section of the Civil Rights Division. In addition, the Public Integrity Section of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division can become involved when allegations arise that criminal vote fraud has occurred in a federal election.

In general, if you have information about voter fraud, please contact the nearest office of the FBI or your local U.S. Attorney’s office or the Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division. Furthermore, if you have information about voter intimidation, coercion or threats, please contact the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division. If you know of activities that intimidate, coerce, threaten, or oppress voters based on race, color, religion, or national origin, please contact the Criminal Section:

Chief, Criminal Section
Civil Rights Division
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. - PHB
Washington, D.C. 20530

(202) 514-3204
The Constitutional Rights Foundation has a compilation of Examples of Election Fraud:
Voter Fraud (Illegal Voting)

• Giving false identity, citizenship, residency, etc., when registering to vote.
• Voting when not eligible or qualified.
• Voting in the name of another such as someone who has died or moved.
• Voting multiple times in an election.

Other Types of Election Fraud

• Registering fictitious persons or those not eligible to vote; paying persons to register.
• Buying votes.
• Threatening voters to vote in a certain way or not to vote.
• Tampering with voting machines.
• Completing an absentee ballot of a person who did not say how it should be marked.
• Stuffing ballot boxes with invalid ballots.
• Changing or destroying valid ballots.
• Falsely counting or certifying voting results.
Should CNMI voters be concerned? Vote below in the unscientific poll or comment:


Are concerns about election fraud valid?

Filipino Teachers Victims of Human Trafficking

August 18, 2010

While members of the partisan U.S. Congress fight amongst themselves and devote hours to campaigning each day, thousands of foreign workers in the U.S. and its territories are suffering as victims of human trafficking at the hands of unscrupulous recruiters and labor contractors. The U.S. Congress and the U.S. DoJ have done far too little to address the exploitation of foreign workers and victims of human trafficking on U.S. soil.

There has been an urgent need for comprehensive immigration reform for decades, but never has the need been so critical as it is today. In just the last few years there has been an explosion of abuse and exploitation of foreign workers, combined with an ever growing  hostile and racist attitude towards the people who makeup our country's much-needed foreign workforce. A campaign of hate against migrant workers and immigrants has been championed by members of the Tea Party, hate radio talk show show hosts, and "conservative" political propagandists, including members of the U.S. Congress, as well as local and state officials. The anti-immigrant and unconstitutional CNMI and Arizona laws, and the handful of proposed copy cat laws that are springing up in states like Florida testify to the anti-immigrant sentiment that is poisoning the United States and its territories.

Still, there may be a glimmer of hope for some of the abused foreign workers. On August 5, 2010 the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and the law firm of Covington and Burling LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of 350 Filipino teachers who were brought to Louisiana under HB-1 visas and kept as indentured servants.

The defendants in the Louisiana case are two recruiting companies and some Louisiana school officials who are being accused of human trafficking, racketeering, and fraud.  The school officials  "helped to keep the teachers in indentured servitude," according to an SPLC press release.

From the SPLC website:
“We were herded into a path, a slowly constricting path, where the moment you feel the suspicion that something is not right, you’re already way past the point of no return,” said Ingrid Cruz, one of the Filipino teachers.

In other words, they were conned. And the con continues because currently there are very few standards that govern the way teachers are recruited from abroad. The problem goes beyond criminal exploitation. Many of these teachers were recruited to fill positions at hard-to-staff U.S. schools. Once they arrived they were often thrown into situations where they faced stressful language and cultural barriers. Many teachers were put in these untenable situations with no training or mentoring.

The abuses in Louisiana raise all kinds of troubling issues. If even highly educated people can be exploited this readily under our guest worker laws, imagine what is happening to those who are not as educated and not as willing to fight back? And if school districts are so eager to offload their responsibilities as employers, what does that say about how they handle their responsibilities toward students?

Bringing qualified immigrant teachers to the United States can be very helpful. These teachers often possess language or professional skills that are in short supply. And foreign teachers can expose U.S. students to a rich variety of cultural views. But the current system for bringing these teachers into the country corrupts school administrators and frustrates the education process. And as SPLC Legal Director Mary Bauer put it, it is a rip-off waiting to happen. “It’s clear,” she says, “that the very structure of the program lends itself to pervasive worker abuse.”
The 95-page complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint states:
Over the past three school years, more than 350 highly-skilled Filipino teachers have been trafficked into Louisiana through the federal government’s H-1B “specialty occupation” visa program to serve as teachers in public schools. The teachers were systematically defrauded and exploited in the recruitment and hiring process in the Philippines by Defendants, who utilized the promise of a unique opportunity to teach in Louisiana to ensnare teachers in a psychologically coercive and financially ruinous trafficking scheme that subjected the teachers to exorbitant debt and forced labor. Once in the United States, the teachers were further abused and exploited by Defendants, who used a variety of coercive tactics, including abuse of legal process, isolation and segregation, and threats of deportation, to attempt to control the teachers’ actions. When the teachers organized collectively for better conditions, they were victims of severe retaliation.
The complaint tells the story of the unscrupulous recruiter,  convicted criminal Lourdes (Lulu) Navarro from the California-based Universal Placement International, Inc. who worked with the PARS International Placement Agency in Quezon City, Philippines to recruit the teachers.  The recruiters charged between $5,000 and $5,500 in initial recruitment fees for the teaching positions.  They then  charged an additional staggering fee of $16,000 for airfare and the chance to work as a teacher in the U.S. The teachers had already paid the initial fee that the recruiters refused to refund and could not afford to back out from paying the second fee according to the complaint. The recruiter defendants referred the teachers to unscrupulous lenders that charged outrageous interest fees in  order that they could pay all the fees.

The lawsuit states that once in the states, the recruiter defendants "orchestrated a system of psychological coercion and intimidation to exert continued control over the teachers, including: filing lawsuits against teachers, who complained publicly; isolating teachers from other Filipinos; and threatening deportation or non-renewal of teacher visas."

The lawsuit also alleges that the employer defendants "were knowing beneficiaries of the illegal human trafficking scheme perpetrated by Recruiter Defendants, knew or should have known of the scheme, and aided and abetted the scheme by taking steps to ensure its success." From the lawsuit:
Employer Defendants became aware early on of the unconscionable fees being charged, and took steps to ensure the success of Recruiter Defendants’ scheme, including submitting false letters to federal immigration officials at the request of the Recruiter Defendants, and reporting to Recruiter Defendants those teachers who voiced complaints about the process or who attempted to circumvent the Recruiter Defendants by applying directly to EBRPSB for employment.
This story sounds all too familiar to advocates like myself, and to those who have witnessed the similar suffering and abuse of  tens of thousands of foreign workers in the U.S. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).  This scenario has been repeated over and over and over for decades in the CNMI affecting a wide range of categories of recruited foreign workers from security guards to waitresses, and yes, including Filipino teachers.

For three decades, under the CNMI's unjust guest worker program, only a small number of scammed or abused CNMI foreign workers have been the lucky recipients of any help from the US DoJ, US DoL, human or civil rights organizations, or even private law firms.   Most of the abused workers were returned to their host countries without ever receiving their back wages or justice; some continue to struggle on in the CNMI hoping to collect the money owed to them from their former cheating employers or to seek justice for a variety of abuses.

I hope that this lawsuit is successful and the victims receive justice and compensation.  Hopefully too, the illegal recruiters and others involved in this scheme end up behind bars.

Federal Judge Questions CNMI Sexual Registry Policies

August 17, 2010

For years many have questioned the CNMI's weak laws, lack of enforcement, lenient sentences, and the noncompliance with a sexual offender registry.  Now a federal judge has also expressed dismay with noncompliance.   The Marianas Variety reported that visiting Judge David O. Carter of the California District Court was surprised that  Henry San Nicolas and another defendant were not registered as a sexual offenders.

From the Marianas Variety:
“Why isn’t the [CNMI] imposing these restrictions or safeguards?” Carter asked.

He noted that “the federal court only takes in a small number of defendants, and in the last two weeks, I’ve seen this continuing problem: non-registration.”

Carter said the registration requirements “are really in the best interest of the CNMI.”

“It’s not my jurisdiction,” Carter said, adding that he is leaving the matter “to [his] able [local] colleagues.”

“They’re the ones who safeguard the citizens of this wonderful island. They have the greatest interest in making certain that people are registered,” Carter said.

He said he was concerned “because so many of these [cases] are coming through the federal court, and we’re seeing this lack of registration time and time again. I trust we’ve got very competent [local] judges who are now aware of the problem and will resolve it from this point forward. Let’s leave it at that.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney James J. Benedetto explained, in an e-mail to the Variety, that “the duration of the registration requirement depends on whether one has been convicted of a Tier 1, Tier 2 or Tier 3 offense, with Tier 1 being the least serious, and Tier 3 being the most serious. If someone has been convicted of Tier 1 crimes, then they have to register for 10 years. Tier 2 requires registration for 25 years (Tier 2 and 3 include crimes like kidnapping, child exploitation, sex trafficking of minors, child prostitution, using a child to produce child pornography, etc.).”

Benedetto added, “Further complicating things is that there are local laws requiring registration of offenders, and they have separate requirements, separate from the federal registration law.”
At the San Nicolas bail modification hearing held last week, the defendant's pre-trial release was revoked and he was turned over to the Federal Marshall to be returned to prison without bail because he failed to disclose previous arrests including a sexual assault of a minor.

Henry San Nicolas, was an employee of the Tinian Mayor's Office who was assigned to work at the Tinian Public Library at the time of his arrest in May 2010.  He was arrested for distribution of methamphetamine (ice). He was released on $25,000 bail, but U.S. Probation Officer Grace Flores filed a "Petition for Action of Conditions of Release" on July 28, 2010 exposing that the defendant failed to disclose previous arrests involving sexual abuse of a minor:
On May 28, 2010, at a Bail hearing, the defendant was ordered released under pretrial supervision with the following conditions: execute a $25,000 unsecured bond; submit to the third party custody of Ms. Sheila Dela Cruz (common-law wife) and Ms. Elisa San Nicolas (mother); surrender passport and obtain no new one; not leave Saipan or Tinian without written permission from the court; avoid contact, directly or indirectly, with any persons who are or who may become a victim or potential witness in the subject investigation or prosecution; refrain from possessing a firearm, destructive device, or other dangerous weapon; refrain from any use of alcohol; refrain from use or unlawful possession of a narcotic drug or other controlled substance; submit to any method of testing required by the pretrial services officer for determining whether he is using a prohibited substance; participate in a program of inpatient or outpatient substance abuse therapy and counseling if deemed advisable by the pretrial services office; refrain from obstructing or attempting to obstruct or tamper with the efficiency and accuracy of any prohibited substance testing; participate in the home confinement program under the curfew component of the program (curfew from 6pm to 7am); be with one of his third party custodians except during work when he will be monitored by a supervisor who will contact the probation officer when he leaves; not leave his residence on weekends except in the company of a third party custodian and with notification to the U.S. Probation Office; and be allowed to travel between Saipan and Tinian without written permission from the Court, and only upon notification to the U.S. Probation Office. 
After the defendant's release on May 28, 2010, the U.S. Probation Office received the defendant's criminal record. These records had not been available prior to this date. A review of the records revealed that the defendant had two previous arrests for criminal behavior which he had not disclosed to the probation officer. 
The record revealed that on September 19, 1999, the defendant had been arrested for Assault and Battery, in violation of 6 CMC § 1202. This case was not forwarded to the CNMI Attorney General's Office for prosecution. Also, on February 2, 2001, the defendant was arrested for Sexual Abuse of a Child, in violation of 6 CMC § 1311. The probation officer later learned that on February 21, 2001, the defendant was charged in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands with three counts of Sexual Abuse of a Child and two counts of Oral Copulation with a Minor. The defendant pled guilty to one count of Oral Copulation with a Minor and the remaining charges were dismissed. On March 13, 2002, the defendant was sentenced in Superior Court Criminal Case 01-0077 to two years imprisonment (all suspended), two years of probation, 100 hours of community service, a $250 fine, $25 assessment fee, and $100 probation fee. 
On June 11, 2010, during a visit to Tinian, the defendant was asked by U.S. Probation Officer Brunson why he failed to disclose his two previous arrests and previous conviction and he stated that he "forgot." 
The probation officer further discovered that the defendant is not registered with the CNMI Sex Offender Registry, which requires offenders convicted of sexual offenses against minor victims to remain registered for a period of ten years from the date the person is placed on probation. The probation officer notes, however, that the defendant's criminal judgment does not order him to comply with Sex Offender Registry requirements. Additionally, upon release in the instant offense, the defendant was assigned to work in an administrative position at the Tinian Public Library. 
Recommendation: It is respectfully requested that the Court issue a Summons for Henry San Nicolas to appear at a hearing scheduled by the Court, and during that hearing, he be held to answer or show cause why pretrial release in this case should not be revoked, or conditions modified, or for any matter for which the Court may deem just and proper.
Why isn't his name on the sexual offender registry? How many other sexual offenders failed to register or were not registered by law enforcement officials?

I cannot understand how a person could "forget" that he sexually abused a young teenager. According to the Saipan Tribune San Nicolas sexually abused a 15 year old teenage girl "on four occasions from January 2001." From the article:
From her interview with the victim, the investigator learned that the suspect arranged for a meeting with the girl last January by calling her on the phone.

The victim further told an interview she had sexual intercourse with the suspect four times while aware that she was still a minor. She added that the suspect would pick her up to engage in sex and oral copulation and afterwards would drive her home.

She also confessed that she did not want to have sex with Mr. San Nicolas since he used to go out with her best friend. But the suspect reportedly assured the victim it was over between him and her best friend.

Police also sought information from the victim’s best friend and admitted that she and the suspect only kissed at the time they were dating.

The suspect, in an interview with investigators, admitted to having sex with the minor three to four times.
Why would the Tinian Mayor's Office assign a convicted child molester to work at the Tinian Library? Seems like a seriously dangerous and unwise placement, to say the least.

In August 2010, San Nicolas changed his plea from innocent to guilty for "Distribution of a Controlled Substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), punishable by 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C)." The plea agreement was filed with the U.S. District Court of the NMI on August 13, 2010. He is scheduled to be sentenced on November 16, 2010.

According to the Marianas Variety, the judge also questioned why another alleged ice dealer, Edward Quichocho, was not listed on the sexual offender registry.  (I could not locate any case or news where he was arrested for a sexual assault.) From the Variety:
Former Tinian Commonwealth Utilities Corp. resident director Edward Quichocho, who was placed on probation after pleading guilty in an “ice” case, may still be subject to the registration requirements of the local law, “but we were only dealing with the requirements of the federal law,” Benedetto said.

Quichocho’s attorney Michael W. Dotts, said: “The federal statute is complicated and Judge Carter asked the parties in the morning to come back in the afternoon to address whether the statute applied to Mr. Quichocho. The consensus in the afternoon was that the statute did not apply to Mr. Quichocho so it was really a non-issue.”
Quichocho was Tinian's CUC Resident Director when he was arrested in April 2008 one count of distribution of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) and one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. He pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. On August 13, 2010 the judge sentenced him to five years probation and two years supervised release.