Texas Judge Delays Executive Immigration Actions

February 17, 2015

Texas Federal Judge Judge Andrew S. Hanen of Federal District Court in Brownsville, Texas, ruled that President Obama's executive actions exceeded his authority.

In his 123 page opinion  Hanen stated that the failure of DHS to allow public comment on the new policies violated the law.

President Obama said that the administration will appeal the court order, which was scheduled to go into affect tomorrow.

Twenty-five states joined the Texas lawsuit, including Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
Statement by Secretary Jeh C. Johnson Concerning the District Court’s Ruling Concerning DAPA and DACA 
I strongly disagree with Judge Hanen’s decision to temporarily enjoin implementation of Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and expanded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). The Department of Justice will appeal that temporary injunction; in the meantime, we recognize we must comply with it. Accordingly, the Department of Homeland Security will not begin accepting requests for the expansion of DACA tomorrow, February 18, as originally planned. Until further notice, we will also suspend the plan to accept requests for DAPA. 
The Department of Justice, legal scholars, immigration experts and even other courts have said that our actions are well within our legal authority. Our actions will also benefit the economy and promote law enforcement. We fully expect to ultimately prevail in the courts, and we will be prepared to implement DAPA and expanded DACA once we do. 
It is important to emphasize what the District Court’s order does not affect. The Court’s order does not affect the existing DACA. Individuals may continue to come forward and request initial grant of DACA or renewal of DACA pursuant to the guidelines established in 2012. 
Nor does the Court’s order affect this Department’s ability to set and implement enforcement priorities. The priorities established in my November 20, 2014 memorandum entitled “Policies for the Apprehension, Detention and Removal of Undocumented Immigrants” remain in full force and effect. Pursuant to those enforcement priorities, we continue to prioritize public safety, national security, and border security. I am pleased that an increasing percentage of removals each year are of those convicted of crimes. I am also pleased that, due in large part to our investments in and prioritization of border security, apprehensions at the southern border – a large indicator of total attempts to cross the border illegally -- are now at the lowest levels in years.


Anonymous said...

It was a disgrace for the President to intentionally not allow a comment period. The GOP and President need to compromise. I would suggest:
1. Foreign nationals should pay 50% US federal income tax which is similar to what all developed countries charge expat Americans to work in their country
2. Background checks, a fine, and return to country of origin to apply and those with US citizen children should get first opportunity to return.
3. Those complying with the law get work authorization but no citizenship because Americans are against it.
4. Expand the H visa program for skilled persons
5. Expand the investor visa program
6. Create a retiree visa for homebuyers